A Danish man has been convicted of uploading sexually explicit scenes from copyrighted films and TV series on the online site Reddit.
Based on a police document obtained by BBC News, the anonymous individual shared 347 video excerpts of nude scenes in a subreddit he moderated, which were then viewed 4.2 million-plus times.
The country's authorities confirm he has been given a seven-month suspended jail term for copyright infringement.
Experts say the man was charged under a seldom-invoked clause in Denmark's copyright law, with the judge ruling that by taking the footage out of their intended setting, the man had damaged the performers' "ethical entitlements".
He has additionally been convicted of sharing more than 25 terabytes of protected digital content.
From March 2022 to mid-2023, the man known as "the pseudonym KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted adult clips featuring over 100 female performers.
He shared them in the subreddit he was a administrator of.
According to the Denmark's copyright protection group The Rights Alliance (TRA), his online community had more than 6,000 members and users were prompted to ask for excerpts of particular actors.
In last year, advocates filed the incident to the police on behalf of the impacted artists, directors and production companies, which resulted in the forum being shut down.
Andrea Vagn Jensen, among the actresses whose nude content were circulated in the community, explained to Danish media at the period she believed there was a distinction between being seen naked in a movie and appearing on Reddit.
The performer stated the uploads amounted to "exploitation".
The defendant was arrested in September 2024 and admitted guilty to the allegations last month.
In a statement after the ruling, the head of the Rights Alliance Maria Fredenslund remarked the decision sent an "significant" signal "indicating infringements of artists' entitlements has repercussions".
The ruling is viewed as unique in Denmark for its application of the "ethical protections" section of the national copyright law, which specifies an artist's creation cannot be used in a way which infringes upon their reputation.
Intellectual property expert Dr Alina Trapova informed BBC News the legal matter was "unusual" for its focus on the harm to the integrity of an artist, rather than to them economically.
How the ruling could influence nations abroad is uncertain.
But she added there may be "an increasing number of such cases" in the coming years with the advancement of artificial intelligence, where "the sanctity of an individual's work might be tempered with with greater ease".
A seasoned financial analyst with over 10 years of experience in Australian markets, specializing in wealth management and investment strategies.